Revolt of the Scholars

Revolt of the Scholars

by: Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.

http://www.realsci.com/

Scindexกs Instant Publishing Service is about empowerment. The price of scholarly, peerreviewed journals has skyrocketed in the last few years, often way out of the limited means of libraries, universities, individual scientists and scholars. A กscholarly divideก has opened between the haves (academic institutions with rich endowments and wellheeled corporations) and the haves not (all the others). Paradoxically, access to authoritative and authenticated knowledge has declined as the number of professional journals has proliferated. This is not to mention the long (and often crucial) delays in publishing research results and the shoddy work of many underpaid and overworked peer reviewers.

The Internet was suppose to change all that. Originally, a computer network for the exchange of (restricted and open) research results among scientists and academics in participating institutions it was supposed to provide instant publishing, instant access and instant gratification. It has delivered only partially. Preprints of academic papers are often placed online by their eager authors and subjected to peer scrutiny. But this haphazard publishing cottage industry did nothing to dethrone the print incumbents and their avaricious pricing.

The major missing element is, of course, respectability. But there are others. No agreed upon content or knowledge classification method has emerged. Some web sites (such as Suite101) use the Dewey decimal system. Others invented and implemented systems of their making. Additionally, one click publishing technology (such as Webseedกs or Bloggerกs) came to be identified strictly to nonscholarly material: personal reminiscences, correspondence, articles and news.

Enter Scindex and its Academic Resource Channel. Established by academics and software experts from Bulgaria, it epitomizes the tearing down of geographical barriers heralded by the Internet. But it does much more than that. Scindex is a whole, selfcontained, standalone, instant selfpublishing and selfassembly system. Selfpublishing systems do exist (for instance, Purdue Universityกs) but they incorporate only certain components. Scindex covers the whole range.

Having (freely) registered as a member, a scientist or a scholar can publish their papers, essays, research results, articles and comments online. They have to submit an abstract and use Sciendexกs classification (กcallก) numbers and science descriptors, arranged in a massive directory available in the ‘realSci Locatorก. The Locator can be also downloaded and used offline and its is surprisingly userfriendly. The submission process itself is totally automated and very short.

The system includes a long series of thematic journals. These journals selfassemble, in accordance with the call numbers selected by the submitters. An article submitted with certain call numbers will automatically be included in the relevant journals.

The fly in the ointment is the absence of peer review. As the system moves from beta to commercialization, Scindex intends to address this issue by introducing a system of incentives and inducements. Reviewers will be granted กcredit pointsก to be applied against the (paid) publication of their own papers, for instance.

Scindex is the model of things to come. Publishing becomes more and more automated and knowledgeorientated. Peer reviewed papers become more outlandishly expensive and irrelevant. Scientists and scholars are getting impatient and rebellious. The confluence of these three trends spells at the least the creation of a web based universe of parallel and alternative scholarly publishing.

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of กMalignant Self Love Narcissism Revisitedก and กAfter the Rain How the West Lost the Eastก. He is a columnist in กCentral Europe Reviewก, United Press International (UPI) and ebookweb.org and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com. Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com

This article was posted on February 2, 2002

by Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.

Making Money Filling Online Surveys In Your Under

Making Money Filling Online Surveys In Your Underwear

by: Keith Watson

Online surveys are big business and you are being encouraged to take part, as companies are keen to get your opinions on new products or services…

And why not get involved? On the surface this appears to be an attractive and easy way to earn extra money, wherever, whenever. This is not from personal use though, so as always กbuyer bewareก.

But here is something that makes me smile.

What follows is a typical sentence from a website promoting the lifestyle that is possible by carrying out online surveys as a way of earning a living.

กImagine waking up, logging on, filling out a few surveys, and getting a paycheck at the end of the month! You can do it in your underwear!ก

I see this approach all the time!

Why is the idea of working in your night attire or under garments so appealing? Perhaps it is I feel a survey coming on!

Anyway I digress.

Online Market research is a £500 million pound a year industry, and this money is being paid out every day to people like you! These companies need your opinion about new products and advertisements, and this information is so valuable to them that you can earn a lot of extra money by taking part!

In my thirst for knowledge, I decided to dig a bit deeper and find out why these companies spend so much money, and how they use the data.

Whoops! Mistake.

Now, Iกm a simple man, and I had waded in too deep. Read the next paragraph. I mean it.

กWhen the site, documentation or software has been modified to incorporate the prescriptive input from the usability testing, online survey work can once again measure how well the designers have captured the essence of the usability counsel. It is at this phase that some confusion has occurred when surveybased assessments have been referred to as usability testing. In out opinion, this should be more correctly referred to as perceptual affirmation, because although some online surveys include taskbased stimuli, the feedback is generally not the probative and iterative measurement found in the classical usability assessment procedure…ก

Try it again and then Iกll test you.

Who spotted the spelling mistake? Well, you couldn’t expect an academic to worry about the spelling of a three letter word (in out opinion).

I digress again.

If anyone wants the reference source, just email me, because there are pages more like this.

Now, Iกm sure that the academic quoted here has a point, and has probably contributed more than I will ever fathom, to the way we live and shop today. And frankly, good luck to him/her, as we all have to earn a living.

However, I have surfaced again just to say look they are prepared to pay for your opinion, so if you are seeking a stayathome, but mustmakemoney solution to your needs, this may provide an answer.

Right Iกm off to get dressed.

Oh, and apologies to any academic that should read this.

About The Author

Keith Watson has been developing websites and advising about marketing and sales on the Internet since 1992. For further information about making money on the Internet, visit www.creativeeye.co.uk/recommendations/cbmall.asp

This article was posted on August 03

by Keith Watson